It will prove most fruitful for my audience’s understanding of my work if I understand the source material from which I have derived my work. As I mentioned in an earlier post, John Donne wrote his sacred or “Divine Poems”, as they are called, as an act of prayer and praise to God. It is obvious that the verses he penned were not just the hollow reverberations from the heart of a religion loving atheist. This is an important distinction to make.
Religion loving atheists are not new by any means, so it is not that John Donne predated the concept, but it is more so that he does not represent its definition. I had personally never heard the phrase until I read CHORAL MASTERWORKS: A Listener’s Guide, by Michael Steinberg, who before writing the book had written program notes for the New York Philharmonic, the San Francisco Symphony, and the Boston Symphony. He also wrote liner notes for all the major classical record labels and was a music critic for the Boston Globe as well as a faculty member at Manhattan School of Music and the New England Conservatory.
At any rate, you get the idea that Steinberg pulls quite a lot of weight in the world of “serious music” (I promise we will define this phrase eventually as well). Steinberg borrowed the term from Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer, who coined the phrase while wrestling with a way to describe his own spiritual situation. It seems like a straightforward enough term, but some unpacking may be useful.
You see, many people in the world are not true God-fearing believers, but are instead religion loving atheists. They come in all sorts of packages, Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, and so forth. People cling to routines and habits and religion is one of the most gripping ritual behaviors humans have in the repertoire of repetitive lifelong traditions. When our love for the comfort that comes with ceremony trumps our deepest convictions of either a) the existence of God, or b) our hearts inclination towards Him, then we become at strongest conviction religion loving agnostics, and at least religion loving atheists.
What does this have to do with composition? Many of the greatest works in the repertoire of God-honoring sacred music were written by men whose faiths were, as Steinberg says, “shaky or outright nonexistent”, or by men who were, “engaged in an unceasing struggle to reinvent God.” Interestingly this does not make their work any less transformative for true believers, in fact even non-believers are often moved and somewhat transformed by masterful sacred music. The music is in many ways separated from its composer once it is unleashed upon the masses. The French literary critic Roland Barthes wrote extensively on the subject, “To give a text an Author is to impose a limit on that text.”
In many ways I do agree. Interpretation can only be unleashed fully when an art touches a viewer and affects him personally. I believe, however, that a master artist can forge his creativity into a precise concept strong enough to sway the average viewer towards his intent.
John Donne, then, being a devout Christian is meaningful to me because I know that I am connecting with his same thoughts and struggles that he had in writing his Divine Poems as I wrestle to set them to music.
Why is it an important distinction that John Donne, by all accounts, believed in the God he was writing to? Because I personally feel a stronger connection to the text and its author knowing that his art was more than a mental exercise.
Yes, Roland Barthes, I understand the author is dead, but so are you.
